Gambler’s fallacy is unavoidable, as research has shown. However, poker isn’t as simple as a coin toss or roulette, so it’s possible to avoid gambler’s fallacy in some cases.
Here’s how to avoid gambler’s fallacy in poker.
Change the table every time
Gambler’s fallacy predicts outcomes based on past experience and subjectivity. If you don’t want to be influenced by past results, it’s a good idea to change the table every time you play the game. That way, you will be able to play the game with a new feeling every time, regardless of past results.
It may be difficult to change the table for each game at Land Casino, but at online casinos you are free to change the table.
If you want to avoid making subjective judgments, it’s a good idea to change the table each time and reset your thoughts at the same time.
Train logical thinking
Poker is not a game where luck is important, but a game where bargaining with opponents is important. Therefore, it is possible to avoid gambler’s fallacy by training logical thinking and formulating strategies according to detailed information such as actions, remarks, and gestures of opponent players.
The reason coin tosses and roulette are susceptible to gambler’s fallacy is that these games have few hints to predict the outcome and you have to intuitively predict the outcome. This causes the gambler’s fallacy to work.
However, there are many tips in poker that you can use to read and anticipate the flow of the game. By using information as a basis, you can make logical decisions rather than intuitively, making it less susceptible to gambler’s fallacy.
How to Overcome Gambler’s Fallacy
Gambler’s fallacy is one of the cognitive biases that is difficult to overcome because it is unknowingly judged by the brain. So far, no effective way to overcome the gambler’s fallacy has been proven.
In 1967, Beach and Swensson cut a pile of drawn cards well, pulled one of them to show to the subject, and instructed them to anticipate the shape drawn on the next drawn card. The we.
Subjects were divided into two groups. I told one group in advance about the existence and nature of the gambler’s fallacy and instructed them to anticipate without depending on the order of the previous cards.
On the other hand, the second group did not give any information about the gambler’s fallacy.
In this way, we gave different conditions to the two groups, but in fact the results show that the response styles of the two groups are similar, and the subjects in both groups have the same length of consecutive figures. The result is that we make predictions based on.
This study proves that even if you give advance notice of the existence of gambler’s fallacy, its effects cannot be avoided.
Therefore, even in casino games such as poker, it is difficult to be unaffected by gambler’s fallacy, and unknowingly predict the results subjectively and based on experience.